The decision by the Ohio Judge is a significant one and, I believe, if it stands it can have far reaching tentacles toward other traffic "traps." From what I understand, the company that owns the monitoring machines receives 40% of the revenue from the $105 penalty. So immediately, I have a suspicion that the company…
Read more
No, they make the streets safer with minimal loss of life and minimal expense. We do not have a right to speed or drive dangerously and since the cameras are not sufficient to bring criminal charges, I do not believe they violate our individual rights. I am open to being convinced otherwise and will be…
Read more
It absolutely violates rights. Glad this judge stood up for justice. Way too much Big Brother stuff going on out there. Drones, speed cameras...what's next?
Read more
- 1
- 2