No, I believe the events in Syria should be considered independently of any other incidents or scandals. At this point a majority of Americans do not want to go into Syria in any way. The Syrian army is heavily militarized and could send missiles that would take out our warships stationed nearby. We do not…
Read more
Since the President has not avenged the lives of the 4 Americans in Benghazi, Congress should recognize that in the role as Commander in Chief, Obama will make a mess getting involved in Syria's civil war. There are no good options there.
Read more
Absolutely, Benghazi should be considered. We still have no answers. Americans died, after requesting protection from their government, that was never provided. Americans have not been given answers. Family members of these brave Americans deserve to know who is responsible for these deaths and who gave the orders to "Stand Down." There should be so…
Read more
Yes, consider Benghazi when taking action in Syria.
Read more
As the Attorney General, Eric Holder is the top prosecutor, not the top Justice. He has no right to "declare" a law unconstitutional and therefore not worthy of defense. If he is not willing to enforce the law, even ones he doesn't agree with, then he should step down. So basically, he sues states that…
Read more
I see that there are legal opinions that support the AG's announcement. It would be also legal to have those provisions legally changed prior to the announcement that they simply will not be enforced. It is outside the law to just state that laws of the United States will not be enforced. They should be…
Read more
This revelation by AG Holder is more evidence of the intent of the Obama Administration to demoralize this country and the military. Their end game seeks a reinstatement of the draft and mandatory service for both men and women. This will become necessary due to the lack of people willing to volunteer to serve our…
Read more
I'ts not the attorney general's job to determine what is unconstitutional. It's his job to enforce the laws that have been duly passed by Congress and signed by the President. The attitude that he can enforce only the laws that he agrees with virtually makes him the most powerful person in the country. The congress…
Read more
If those at the top, if our Leadership can not enforce the Laws as they are written, then why should anyone follow any Law? and these folks ... they are virtually exempt from any consequences to their actions so Mr. Holder figures "Why not do as we please .. no one has stopped us yet".
Read more
Hey, who needs amendments ratified by the states? Who needs a Supreme Court? Who needs ANY courts? Or any laws for that matter? We have Eric Holder. And it "has long been his view." Well. Okay then.
Read more