Kathy Hildebrand | Palladian View

It seems silly even to point out the obvious anymore. To call this President a socialist and to say that he is stealthily engineering a redistribution of wealth is laughable. He isn't doing it undercover. It's priority #1 in his SOTU address. It's what America now IS and ADMIRES. And since there are more dependents…

This is the President who sees self-reliance and opportunity as the enemy. He is in fact the President of Government Assistance for the Purpose of Income Equality. "If we allow or promote opportunity for all and free enterprise, why then the enterprising among us just may avail themselves of that opportunity and 'get ahead' causing…

I don't have access to the facts of his alleged violations. I would just say that it looks a bit suspect, and let it play out from here as the facts unfold.

But, sir, do you have a copy of the Constitution?

I've recently heard the following appropriate analogy. When the government shut down (the dems and their media colleagues called it a "GOP shutdown" but the truth is that the Democrats would not fund ANY of the government if they didn't get their Obamacare funded, so in the end it was their decision to shut it…

1. America seeing that they're supposed to trust the folks who can't build a working website with the life and health of their families. 2. "What difference does it make?!?!" And THIS from the woman who wants to be (and very well may be) our next president.

Well, I have never been able to pull off a pull-up! But then I've never pictured myself "combat-ready" either. Why are the requirements not "required"? Why the delay? Is this sort of like Obamacare? "Required" until it doesn't seem so realistic after all, so "not required."

"Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was the first federal law designed to protect most U.S. employees from employment discrimination based upon that employee's (or applicant's) race, color, religion, sex, or national origin." copied from Wikipedia. This man expressed his personal beliefs in the Word of God. He is being discriminated against. This is…

I'm not all that knowledgeable about this idea of making a "sort of" decision that a policy is "likely" unconstitutional and then immediately "staying" that decision. Is this typical or common? Sounds like judicial schizophrenia to a layman like me.

Nope, they are not free to re-define the basic institution of American (actually ALL) life. Just like folks whose religion tells them they can stone people or sacrifice their children. (Actually not in America; can't do it here.) And why is it that every "way out there" religious "freedom" is championed by these folks, but…

About: Kathy Hildebrand

Recent Posts by Kathy Hildebrand

Recent Comments by Kathy Hildebrand

Overview

Palladian View