data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d37ef/d37ef8e7f8f44b2a0d584b8cdf211cf8c83a4706" alt="Nancy Elliott"
This is another example of the thought police ruling. It is not that someone wanting your service or product can't get it elsewhere. This is a matter of someone trying to force you to accept whatever lifestyle or action they may choose and be complicit in it, against your will. This is against the concept of freedom. And really how can anyone know why someone might refuse to provide a service. Maybe they are too busy. Will anyone that refuses anything to a newly "protected class" be in danger of violating the purchaser's rights? We need to go back to the common sense of our Constitution, which wisely protected our freedom of speech and religion.